SAUL in JERUSALEM

Saul in Jerusalem  

The Passage: Acts 9:23-31

Structure:

a. 9:23-25, the Jews conspired to kill him

  b. 9:26, they were all afraid of him

    c. 9:27, his report about the road to Damascus 

  b’. 9:28, he moved freely with them

a’. 9:29-30, they tried to kill him

Conclusion: v.31 – the church grew

Historical and geographical context: Geography – from now on Saul (later Paul) will not be able to stay in one place for “too long”. Either because of danger or due to the Gospel call, he will travel allover Mediterranean region. From Damascus to Jerusalem, from Jerusalem to Caesarea etc. Therefore, from the locality of Jerusalem narrative we are shifting to a travel log of Saul, Peter and Paul.

Also, note how the narrative intertwines historically – we saw St. Peter as a “spokesman” of the church on multiple occasions. Then the attention shifts to Stephen, then Philip, now to Saul. Next block will introduce Peter again and, after the death of king Herod, St. Luke will be mostly concerned with the travels and preaching of St. Paul. At the same time, it is Barnabas (who was a faithful financial supporter of the church, ch. 4 [cp. lesson “the Believers share their possessions”]) who is introducing/vouching for the discipleship status of Saul.   

Last but not least, from Caesaria Saul is sent to Tarsus (his hometown). Later (11:25) Barnabas will take a trip there to bring him to Antioch. Some believe that this time lag took as long as eight years (Lenski, Acts, p. 377). The length of this period is debatable, and we’ll discuss it at more length later. Yet, it is important to say that it was appointed for Saul to spend some lengthy time outside of Jerusalem, Galilee or, even Samaria, to work through his own convictions and theological presuppositions prior to his active immersion into mission.      

Theology: Jerusalem as a center of apostolic ministry. So far, the life of the church still revolves around the Jerusalem headquarters. Later on, when Paul will get into a dispute about the place of Gentiles in the church, the only place where it could have been solved was Jerusalem – which was the reason and the background for the Jerusalem council (Acts 15).

Fear separates. It is the first time when the disciples in Jerusalem are afraid of a person. The only fear they used to have been the fear of the LORD (and they will restore the balance by the end of the story, cp. 9:31). The immediate effect of this fear is separation – the disciples want to stay away from Saul. They needed an intervention of Bar-Nabas (cp. 4:36), namely “Son of Encouragement” who told them the story of Saul’s conversion – his experience on the road to Damascus and his subsequent preaching of Jesus the Messiah in the city.  

The enemy of my enemy is my friend. Same as unlikely “friends” gathered around Jesus during His trial, Saul attracts equal wrath from both High-Priestly partly and the Hellenists – two groups that would not be in union. Trial of Jesus attracted Herod and Pontius Pilate – king of the Jews and appointee of Rome over the Judea. And the same time – Herod (civil ruler, and a Jew by blood) and High Priests – Annas and Caiaphas (who did their best to maintain the authority of the Temple over the people).       

Short dispute with the Hellenists. Hellenists were the Jews who were born and raised in Diaspora. Therefore, their prime language was Greek and the Bible they read was LXX (not MT). It is possible to imagine that Saul engaged in discussions with them here and there based on his diaspora background. We don’t know what exactly triggered their disapproval, but the result was very close to the similar discussion St. Stephen got into (cp. 6:9).   

Other themes: Fear of the LORD and comfort of the Holy Spirit (v. 31). Two things can be said about it. First, the phrase “fear of the LORD” shows the continuity between the believers of Old Testament and the Church. Psalms and Proverbs carry this as a reacquiring phrase, often in connection with wisdom (Ps. 19:9; 111:10; Pr. 1:7; 9:10; 10:27; 22:4). This concept will be used later by St. Paul (cp. 2 Cor. 5:11). Second, Dr. Martin Luther uses the same structure explaining the 10 Commandments: we should fear and love God so that we… do and don’t… These two parts and not in contradiction with each other – they are two complimentary features of God’s character. He has it in perfect balance, we very often go into one of the extremes – either fear or love/comfort. Also, note that the Holy Spirit here is presented as the one who was promised by Jesus – the Comforter (John 14:26).