Book of Acts: Paul meets James at Jerusalem

Paul meets James at Jerusalem

The Passage: Acts 21:18-26

Structure:

a. 21:18, God completed the ministry

  b. 21:19-21, Gentiles and the Law

    c. 21:22-24, you yourself live in obedience to the Law

  b’. 21:25, Gentiles and the Law

a’. 21:26, offering made for each of them

Historical and geographical context:

James. Jesus had two disciples with this name: James, the son of Zebedee, brother of John and James, son of Alphaeus. The first one died from the hand of Herod Agrippa I (Acts 12:1-2). Which leaves James, son of Alphaeus, to be a speaker at the council of Jerusalem (Acts 15:12-21) and a leader of Jerusalem community at the time of Paul’s arrival. Some scholars identify him with James, the brother of Jesus (Mk. 6:3, 15:40). On the other hand, there is a possibility that he is the brother of Matthew/Levi, the tax collector (Mt. 10:3; Mk. 2:14).

Important to note that Jerusalem church re-gained their membership really fast. To understand it we need to compare 8:1-2; 15, and 21:20. St. Luke writes that Jerusalem congregation recovered from a devastating hit on the church by Saul, when only 12 apostles stayed. In chapter 15 we see that the church had both apostles and elders – giving an impression of well-developed leadership, assuming the need for it with a large number of returned or new members. Here James mentions 20,000+ people (21:20). Most of the translations (ESV included) take Greek “murias” as thousands, while in other passages of the Bible rendering it as “tens of thousands” (Acts. 19:19; Rev. 9:16). [it is also interesting to see an avoidance of translation in Rev. 5:11].

Theology:

The Law. In the next stories we need to understand that “the Law” is not simply a set of rules and regulations, it is the Five Books of Moses – Torah, the foundational cornerstone of Jewish way of life, thinking, and acting (Ps. 1:2; Pr. 31:26; Acts 21:28). James said that Jerusalem congregation had at least 20,000 who are zealous for Torah – meaning they belonged to the Pharisees. St. Paul will identify himself as the one in the next story (22:3). He will use the distinction between the Pharisees and Sadducees to his advantage during his defense (23:6-10).

Paul was an observant Jew. The main accusation/suspicion that Jerusalem church had to deal with was teaching the Jews to act like Gentiles. We know he didn’t do that (cp. Eph. 4:17), but to disprove these claims he would participate in the ceremony of the ending of a temporal Nazarene vow by paying the expenses of those who took the vows upon themselves (v. 23-24). Also, it is possible that these guys did not end their vows but – for whatever exact reason – had to start over. The reason for this understanding is based on the reading of Num. 6:6-12. This would explain the reason for “seven days” mentioned at the beginning of the next story (Acts 21:27). The whole company should’ve gone to the Temple to shave their heads and have the arrangements for the next day sacrificial ceremony. If this understanding is correct, then St. Paul did not pay a huge sum of money – 4 pairs of turtledoves or pigeons (Num. 6:10). The payment for the conclusion of the vow is listed in Num. 6:13-15.

At the end of the day – it was not a question about the Gentiles. James simple re-states the same requirements to become a member of the church for the one who did not have Jewish origin, mentioning the Letter of Jerusalem council which he himself proposed (cp. Acts 15:19-21, 23-29; 21:25).

Other themes: Nazarene vows. The full description can be found in the Book of Numbers 6:1-20. Two important notes: vows can be for life (taken by parents) and temporal. We have at least three people who were under the life-long vows: Samson, Samuel, and John the Baptizer. We have examples of people taking a temporal vow (Judg. 5:2 [lit. they let their hair grow loose]; a needed piece of information for a better understanding of 2 Kg. 2:23-25). Then there is a question about Jesus and his possible Nazarene status. He definitely was not a long-life Nazarene (Mt. 11:18-19). Thou, it is possible to read Mt. 26:29 as a part of the vow. This can be a reason why the final drops of vinegar during crucifixion are connected to the completion – therefore, beginning of His kingdom (Mt. 27:48-50; John 19:29). On the other hand, the Nazarene vow does not promote a perpetual sobriety of Jesus – as claimed by SDA and other churches. Num. 6:3 equally prohibit wine and juice, and grapes and raisins. 

Gospel of John: Woman at the Well

Woman at the Well

text: John chapter 4

Outline:

A. 4:1-6, Geography remark on the reasons to go through Samaria to Galilee

  B. 4:7-26, Conversation with Samaritan woman at the well about Christ

    C. 4:27-38, Food discussion with the disciples

  B'. 4:39-45, Samaritans believe “for themselves”

A'. 4:46-54, Jesus comes to Galilee, healing of a boy.

Comments: This is one of the most complicated chapters in the Gospel of John. There are few pairs of tensions: Jews vs. Samaritans; man vs woman; wells vs mountains; faith of Samaritans vs Ministry in Cana. Let us walk through the chapter to see the beauty of the Gospel.

Woman at the well. There is a symbolic level of this story. We have at least three stories in the Books of Genesis and Exodus when a man meets with a bride at a well. Abraham sent a servant to find a wife for Isaac, and he meets Rebekah by the well (Genesis 24:11-15). Jacob meets Rachel by the well (Genesis 29:9-10). Moses meets his wife by the well (Exodus 2:17-17).

Add to this – Jesus became the seventh man in the life of the woman. She was married five times, now there is another (sixth) man, then comes Jesus – the man of Sabbath. He gives her rest. To understand it we should note that she comes to fetch the water at noon – she preferred the heat of the sun vs. heat of the remarks of the local women. But at the end of the story she runs to the city and – what is very important – people believe her and take words respectfully.

Wells turned into mountains. What began at the well under the blazing sun turned into a conversation about the mountains. From one of the lowest places they shift the attention of their dialog to the highest. And Jesus leads her to the ultimate understanding – the point is not for US to climb a mountain, the point is to meet with the Father, who is actively seeking the worshipers in the Spirit and the truth through Jesus the Messiah (John 4:23-26, cp. John 14:6).

Evangelism “questions” of Jesus. To bring her to this realization Jesus leads the woman through the maze of question. He starts with a simple proposition – asking for the water. John explains it in the most obvious way – disciples are gone and He wanted her to help Him. She could've simple give Him a drink – and that would be the end of the story. Yet, she is a smart and a curious woman. She engages in a conversation. Every request, question, or statement Jesus makes has an open-ended character. She could stop Him at any given point – being upset, or offended, or... fill the blank... But she doesn't end until Jesus reveals Himself as the Messiah. This news frees her to rush to her hometown, sharing this Good News or the Gospel (John 4:29-30).

After two days the people of Samaria, Jesus leaves (on the third day). Two things worthy to be noted here: first, their personal encounter of Jesus (John 4:42); second, the faith of Samaritans vs the rejection of the Pharisees (cp. John 4:1).

Food as doing God's will. While she is gone and the people of Samaria didn't come yet, the disciples got an important lesson, a lesson on the food from God. When we think about the food – it is something that we eat. We eat to get “fuel,” for pleasure, for the joy of fellowship. All of this three aspects of food are given in Jesus' statement about doing the will of the Father (John 4:34). Then the Father prescribes the actions to do – they feed us, as the sacrament of the Altar.

Son of Capernaum official is healed at Cana. The distance between Cana and Capernaum is about 20 miles – a day of travel. The official came to Cana to meet Jesus, as the healer. There is a short conversation between them, where Jesus tries to point him toward faith, believing in the Son of God (John 4:48). But it doesn't look like the man is interested in Jesus as the savior – he simply wants his son to be healed. And what is interesting, is Jesus grants him his request. Son will be healed, but nothing else.

This shows Jesus as a compassionate Savior of the world – He responds to people's requests (not always grants all of them), but He never forces people to relate to Him. He man was looking for son's wellness, and nothing else. Jesus grants his request, which leads to man's realization that Jesus didn't requires anything in return, healing his son immediately by His mighty Word. This resulted in faith of the man and his [whole] household (John 4:53).

This sign-faith connection is going to be expanded when Jesus will address Thomas – blessed are those who didn't see but believed (John 20:29), speaking about us. We believe because of the Word reviled in the Bible and the Sacraments (AC V:2). This faith gives us the reason to ask and pray to the LORD for the health, help, and support of our loved ones and ourselves.

Book of Acts: Paul goes to Jerusalem

Paul goes to Jerusalem

The Passage: Acts 21:1-17

Structure:

a. 21:1-3, Journey of St. Paul

  b. 21:4-6, “don’t go to Jerusalem”

    c. 21:7-9, Visit to Philip (the Deacon)

  b’. 21:10-14, owner of the belt will be bound in Jerusalem

a’. 21:15-17, Journey of Paul

Historical and geographical context:

Many travels: Cos, Rhodes, Patara, Phoenicia, (passing by Cyprus, possibly they got lost), Syria, Tyre, Ptolemais, Caesaria, Jerusalem. About a month of travel.

Visit of Philip. Philip is mentioned as one of the deacons of Jerusalem congregation (Acts 6:5). Then he ministered outside of Jerusalem, preaching in Samaria and converting the Ethiopian eunuch (Acts ch. 8). Apparently, he settled in Caesaria serving an evangelist (a person who proclaims the “good news”, cp. Eph. 4:11), being an active part of the congregation started by Cornelius (Acts 10).

Staying with Mnason of Cyprus. The man is mentioned only once in the Bible. Recently, scholarship got into a heated debate. Was he of a Greek origine (being from Cyprus) or a Jew (cp. Acts 4:36)? Where was the house: between Caesaria and Jerusalem or next to Jerusalem? With the shortness of the Biblical background, we can say definitively very little. First, Luke calls him “early” disciple (ESV), lit. “old” (or from of old). Which can mean – one of the unnamed 70/72 that Jesus sent on a mission (Lk. 10:1-20). Or, he could’ve been one of the “converts” of Pentecost or visits of Peter (Acts 9:36-10:48). IMHO, the MOST important take away – St. Paul and his companions (including St. Luke) did not use the system of inns (cp. Lk. 2:7; Mt. 2:9). Together with the previous note (on Philip) and other Biblical passages (Heb. 13:2-3; 2 John 9-11; Gal. 6:10) we can see that the Church creates its inner connectedness between the members of the Kingdom.

Theology:

Postures for prayer. Second time in a row we see that people praying for the travels of St. Paul and his companions kneeling. There are a few postures mention in the Scripture: standing (Rom 14:10-12; note that St. Paul quotes Is. 45:23 mentioning that “every knee shall bow”), prostrating (Neh. 8:9; Mt. 2:11), raising of hands (1 Tim. 2:8). Different postures are applicable for different situations.

Theology of New Testament prophecy. In the times of the Old Testament prophets were people from “the counsel of God” – He valued their opinion (cp. Amos 3:7; 7:1-6; Abraham is an example of the prophet – Gen. 18:17-19; 20:6). Then they would deliver the will of the Lord to the people in their speeches/sermons and/or writings. Sometimes they would be given a glimpse of the future (Dan. ch. 7 through 12). In the New Testament their role is basically the same – familiarize people with the will of God and (very rare) foretell the future. Thou Agabus appears twice in the Book of Acts and both times delivers a sad message (below).

Paul follows the footsteps of Jesus. Nobody tried to talk St. Peter from his arrests or afflictions. This is the second time we have seen people attempting to change Paul’s decision to appear in Jerusalem. His response is similar to the response of Jesus – basically, we encounter “get behind me Satan” scene (cp. Mt. 16:21-23). Also, see the parallel between what the companions of Paul say accepting his determination and the prayer of Jesus in the Garden (Mt. 26:36-44; Acts 21:14).

Brothers vs. disciples. St. Luke uses two different terms describing the members of the church. It is possible that these terms indicate a somewhat different status within the community of believers. On the other hand, he might have a different nuance in mind – he mentions “disciples” pointing out their respect toward the apostle. When he uses “brother”, St. Luke refers to the family status of all the members of the church, stating equality of the Pauline status in relation to the status of Jerusalem and Caesarian leadership.

Other themes: Agabus – sad prophet. First, he appears in Acts 11:27-30 (lesson 25). Back there he brought sad news about the famine. Here, he predicts the imprisonment of “the owner of the belt” (Acts 21:11). Looks like God trusts him with a delivery of sad news to the brothers. It is a very difficult ministry – to carry out it faithfully is a great achievement, however unpleasant. Also, see an example of the ministry of Jeremiah the prophet; and the ultimate example of prophetic ministry of Jesus. 

The Twelve: St. James, the Minor

St. James, the Minor

Meaning of the name: James is actually Jacob – don't ask me why the translators changed it. Jacob means “holder of the heel” or “supplanter.”

Mark (2:14) mentions that the tax collector's name is Levi, the son of Alphaeus. Comparing it with Matthew 9:9, makes it possible that Matthew (the Levi) and James were brothers. But, unlike James and John, they are not put together. This might mean that the connection to Jesus was stronger that the family ties.

A possible explanation to this might be a fact of rejection of Matthew's “vocation.” In those days the tax-collector was employed by Roman occupational government. No wonder that St. Luke, giving his list of the Twelve, places James together with Simon the Zealot (an extremist terrorist organization, trying to subvert or get rid of the Roman rule). It is possible that James was way closer with Simon in his political views than with his own brother. There are at least two lessons to learn here. First, we do not have a record of a single conflict between the brothers, regardless of the reason of their estrangement. Second, Jesus is the Lord for those who had or have good family life, and those whose family life is not the best.

Life story: We don't have much information about the apostle. He is present in all of the lists of the Twelve. This means that he was part of the first apostolic instruction and “deployment” (Matthew 10).

It also means that he was present at the calming of the storm (Mark 4:35-41) and feeding of 5000 (Mark 6:30-44). He was actively engaged in the life of Jesus' community. The apostles talked to one another after the storm about the exhibition of Christ' power. To participate in this conversation one need to know Psalm 107: 23-32. Which shows the depth of James' knowledge and reverence of the Scriptures.

His constant presence among the Twelve means his partaking of the Last Supper. Unlike Peter, who argued with Jesus about washing of the feet and then about the power to withstand the temptations (we know it didn't end well), James is a deep thinker, who takes the offered gifts contemplating the amazing measure of the love and care of the Lord toward fallen humanity.

This love led him to become a leader of Jerusalem church at the time of the First Jerusalem counsel (Acts 15), as well as St. Paul's return from the Third Mission trip (Acts 21). The reason we know it should him is the fact that James the brother of John was killed by Herod (Agrippa) a few years earlier to please the Jewish leadership of the capital (Acts 12:1-2).

This makes even more possible that he is the author of the Letter of James. For the letter addresses biblical principles of the Christian community in a hostile environment.

The epistle is important to us for at least three reasons. It sets the patterns of order in the congregation – not quarrelling, but relying on the wisdom from above, all matters should be solved in peace and reason (3:17). Second, the orderly life also can be reflected in the way the church treats the powerful figures of this world. James/Jacob argues for avoiding partiality. Which leads to the third lesson of the Epistle. The rich will assault the church, therefore, in the light of forthcoming tribulations, we need to learn and train ourselves to set aside zealotry, but practice patience in sufferings, confessing our sins, and calling back the wanderers.

Prayer: May 1, St. Phillip and St. James.

Almighty God, Your Son revealed Himself to Philip and James, and gave them the knowledge of everlasting life. Grant us perfectly to know Your Son, Jesus Christ, to be the way, the truth, and the life, and steadfastly to walk in the way that leads to eternal life; through Jesus Christ, out Lord, Who lives and reigns with You and the Holy Spirit, not and forever. Amen.

Gospel of John: First Passover

First Passover

text: John 2:13-25

Structure:

A. 2:13, Passover at Jerusalem

  B. 2:14-16, Jesus is in the Temple

    C. 2:17, Disciples remembered

  B'. 2:18-21, Jesus talks about the Temple

    C'. 2:22, Disciples remembered

A'. 2:23-25, Passover at Jerusalem

Comments: The Gospel of John is structured around three Passovers. First one is here, in chapter 2. The second one is a Passover-related – chapter 6. And thirst one is the longest of Gospel's story, John 12 – 20. There are four main themes in the first Passover: Passover itself, the Temple, signs of Jesus, and people coming to faith.

Passover of the Jews. The original Passover happened about 1400 years prior. Since then the Feast was a commemoration of the Exodus (remembering the past) and celebration of the work of God in the present. Even secular master minds use this paradigm – Isaac Asimov's short story “Anniversary” (1959) sets the plot in a house where three friends “recreate” the events of their rescue, living through them year after year as a symbolic ritual. The Sons of Israel supposed to live through the events of the first Passover as one of the three “required” feasts to attend (Deuteronomy 16:16-17).

Temple. This is the Second Temple. The first one – as everyone knows was built by king Solomon. And it was destroyed in the time of Jeremiah (587 BC). The Second Temple was built after the exile (see Books of Ezra and Nehemiah) and really beautified and expanded by king Herod (at least something good done by him). He ended up creating a large complex about 36 acres. Pilgrims from the whole world would come there. Therefore, the people who provided the possibility for fitting sacrificial animals were a blessing to worshiping community. But (!) as usual, people, being very creative in perverting the God's gifts, subverted the whole purpose of the sacrificial system into the money flowing enterprise.

Again, the problem was not with the money per se, the problem was that they would sell the animals in the sanctuary. What is the problem with this? Two things. People were more concerned with the getting the right/perfect lamb or ox than the meaning and reason for these sacrifices.

Also, the altar of the LORD WAS a place of exchange – people confessed their sins, getting absolution in return. But (!) having a trading outpost in the sanctuary created a sense of even exchange – I paid money, got an animal, then got my blessings. This procedure clouded the sense of grace that was engraved into the system. That's why Jesus rebukes them “do not make my Father's house a house of trade” (John 2:16).

Signs of Jesus. The theme of signs began in the previous passage (the first sign – turning water into wine in Cana of Galilee, John 2:1-12). Surprisingly, the Jews (the leadership of the community) were not upset with Jesus, they were looking for an explanation (John 2:18). They took His cleansing right – as a symbolic act. Now, can Jesus give them an explanation? Yes, He can, and He did. But – as we say – it went over their heads. It went over the heads of the Jews, but also went over the heads of the disciples. That's why St. John points out that the disciples remembered His phrase when they witnessed the resurrection of Jesus (John 2:22).

So, what was the meaning of His “sign”? Destruction of the Temple corresponds to the Temple's restoration in three days (John 2:19). Just on the surface, there are at least three aspects that should be taken into an account. First, when Jews emotionally respond to Christ statement, they bring up the factor of 46 years of previous construction project activities. They are not ready to see in the Temple anything but stones, furniture, etc. Jesus talks about [the Temple of] His body (John 2:21). The divine interpretation of His words points to two other aspects. First of all, His bodily resurrection – that's what disciples remembered. But remembrance in the Bible is the verb of action – making steps based on what was remembered. Therefore, third aspect is formation of the Temple of Jesus or Body of Christ – the Church.

People coming to faith. These bold actions (words included) brought many people to faith. Yet, Jesus didn't trust them. He knew their nature... even His disciples left Jesus at the Garden of Gethsemane, and the denial of Peter is a factor for an interpretation of this phrase. Also, they believed seeing His glorious actions. They did not witness the trial, flogging, and crucifixion yet... again, even His disciples did not interpreted the empty tomb right. At best, they were puzzled... Therefore, the fact of Jesus being the Christ is not based on the testimony of man – His actions, words, and testimony of the Father and the Holy Spirit are the formative reasons for our faith. 

Peter reports to Jerusalem Church

Peter reports to Jerusalem Church

The Passage: Acts 11:1-18

Structure:

A. 11:1-3, a complain of circumcision party

  B. 11:4-10, Peter’s report A: his vision – symbolic unity

    C. 11:11-12, Peter’s report B: timely arrival of messengers

  B’. 11:13-17, Peter’s report A’: realization of the vision – the real unity

A’. 11:18, silence and then praise   

Historical and geographical context:

St. Peter comes back to Jerusalem. Prior his arrival apostles and brothers heard about full unity with Gentiles. Therefore, by the time he came back from his “mission trip”, the circumcision party had prepared a set of complaints. This is a familiar Biblical paradigm – when the rumors travel faster than people (Gen. 50:16-17). Also, the way St. Peter responds we’ll discuss in Theology.      

Theology:

Receiving the Word of God. Two things: there are two terms that Bible use translated as “word” – Logos and Rhema. Logos is a conceptual Word – John 1:1. While Rhema is a preaching word – the word delivered in a sermon or proclamation. So, they received the Word – Jesus Christ. It is interesting to see how the accents begin to shift – from the theology of the Name we are moving to theology of the Word. Psalmist – king David – in a crisis appeals to the Word rather than to the Name (Ps. 138:1-2, lit. You have exalted Your Word above Your Name). Later in the Book of Acts we’ll see an even stronger accent on the Word (cp. Acts 17:11, note that they received the Word examining the Scriptures).    

Unity through eating. We already talked about the unity of believers as the heme for these three stories (see more, lesson 22: Visions of Cornelius and Peter, theology: Unity of believers). Here I just want to point out the parallel between the complaints of the circumcision party and the promotion of the [very] Closed Communion (11:3). For circumcision party the houses were micro-temples – eating together is a sharing of thanksgiving meal which should be dedicated to the only God the Creator and Redeemer.       

Pentecost as the beginning. Note how St. Peter draws a connection between the event of Pentecost and his current situation, using the reference to the beginning. It is interesting on a few levels. First, the refence to the beginning should direct us to the creation story – B’reshit, In the beginning (Gen. 1:1). For sure, both stories talk about the presence of the Spirit and Water (Gen. 1:2 and Acts 2:38). The new world/new creation came into existence with the outpouring of the Holy Spirit and emergence of the Church (cp, 2 Cor. 5:17).

On the other hand, the beginning of a new creation can be associated with the Incarnation (John 1:1, Mk. 1:1). This is one of the examples of two stage development of God’s plan – Moses then Joshua, David then Solomon, John the Baptizer then Jesus, Jesus then the Church (cp. Acts 1:1).         

Gift of the Holy Spirit. It is important to reiterate the difference between the gift of the Holy Spirit, the gifts of the Holy Spirit, and the fruits of the Holy Spirit. Here, the gift means forgiveness of sins (salvation). See more lesson 6, “other themes”.

Hard decisions – accepted through silence. The circumcision party came to the meeting with very heavy accusations. Yet, when St. Peter tells them the story of outpouring of the Holy Spirit on the Gentiles and reminds them of the words of Jesus, they had nothing to back up their understanding of the Law. Also, note how the apostle leads the discussion – in order (Heb. be-seder) and humility or, as he will put it later, with gentleness and respect (1 Pet. 3:15). 

Repentance [that leads] to life. Lutherans stress justification by grace through faith. It doesn’t mean that after baptism or conversion a believer can relax thinking “once saved – always saved”. Justification opens the doors to the path of sanctification.  

Other themes:

Interconnectedness of Scripture. St. Peter states that he remembered the words of the Lord (11:16). One can find these words in the Book of Acts 1:5. Right before His Ascension Jesus promises to the apostles that they will be baptized with the Holy Spirit. This promise is based on the teaching of John the Baptizer (Lk. 3:16).

SAUL in JERUSALEM

Saul in Jerusalem  

The Passage: Acts 9:23-31

Structure:

a. 9:23-25, the Jews conspired to kill him

  b. 9:26, they were all afraid of him

    c. 9:27, his report about the road to Damascus 

  b’. 9:28, he moved freely with them

a’. 9:29-30, they tried to kill him

Conclusion: v.31 – the church grew

Historical and geographical context: Geography – from now on Saul (later Paul) will not be able to stay in one place for “too long”. Either because of danger or due to the Gospel call, he will travel allover Mediterranean region. From Damascus to Jerusalem, from Jerusalem to Caesarea etc. Therefore, from the locality of Jerusalem narrative we are shifting to a travel log of Saul, Peter and Paul.

Also, note how the narrative intertwines historically – we saw St. Peter as a “spokesman” of the church on multiple occasions. Then the attention shifts to Stephen, then Philip, now to Saul. Next block will introduce Peter again and, after the death of king Herod, St. Luke will be mostly concerned with the travels and preaching of St. Paul. At the same time, it is Barnabas (who was a faithful financial supporter of the church, ch. 4 [cp. lesson “the Believers share their possessions”]) who is introducing/vouching for the discipleship status of Saul.   

Last but not least, from Caesaria Saul is sent to Tarsus (his hometown). Later (11:25) Barnabas will take a trip there to bring him to Antioch. Some believe that this time lag took as long as eight years (Lenski, Acts, p. 377). The length of this period is debatable, and we’ll discuss it at more length later. Yet, it is important to say that it was appointed for Saul to spend some lengthy time outside of Jerusalem, Galilee or, even Samaria, to work through his own convictions and theological presuppositions prior to his active immersion into mission.      

Theology: Jerusalem as a center of apostolic ministry. So far, the life of the church still revolves around the Jerusalem headquarters. Later on, when Paul will get into a dispute about the place of Gentiles in the church, the only place where it could have been solved was Jerusalem – which was the reason and the background for the Jerusalem council (Acts 15).

Fear separates. It is the first time when the disciples in Jerusalem are afraid of a person. The only fear they used to have been the fear of the LORD (and they will restore the balance by the end of the story, cp. 9:31). The immediate effect of this fear is separation – the disciples want to stay away from Saul. They needed an intervention of Bar-Nabas (cp. 4:36), namely “Son of Encouragement” who told them the story of Saul’s conversion – his experience on the road to Damascus and his subsequent preaching of Jesus the Messiah in the city.  

The enemy of my enemy is my friend. Same as unlikely “friends” gathered around Jesus during His trial, Saul attracts equal wrath from both High-Priestly partly and the Hellenists – two groups that would not be in union. Trial of Jesus attracted Herod and Pontius Pilate – king of the Jews and appointee of Rome over the Judea. And the same time – Herod (civil ruler, and a Jew by blood) and High Priests – Annas and Caiaphas (who did their best to maintain the authority of the Temple over the people).       

Short dispute with the Hellenists. Hellenists were the Jews who were born and raised in Diaspora. Therefore, their prime language was Greek and the Bible they read was LXX (not MT). It is possible to imagine that Saul engaged in discussions with them here and there based on his diaspora background. We don’t know what exactly triggered their disapproval, but the result was very close to the similar discussion St. Stephen got into (cp. 6:9).   

Other themes: Fear of the LORD and comfort of the Holy Spirit (v. 31). Two things can be said about it. First, the phrase “fear of the LORD” shows the continuity between the believers of Old Testament and the Church. Psalms and Proverbs carry this as a reacquiring phrase, often in connection with wisdom (Ps. 19:9; 111:10; Pr. 1:7; 9:10; 10:27; 22:4). This concept will be used later by St. Paul (cp. 2 Cor. 5:11). Second, Dr. Martin Luther uses the same structure explaining the 10 Commandments: we should fear and love God so that we… do and don’t… These two parts and not in contradiction with each other – they are two complimentary features of God’s character. He has it in perfect balance, we very often go into one of the extremes – either fear or love/comfort. Also, note that the Holy Spirit here is presented as the one who was promised by Jesus – the Comforter (John 14:26).